Behind US President Trump’s latest round of tariffs appears to be a pressure strategy to force Canada to make further concessions. Canadian officials revealed to the Advisory Council on Economic Growth that of the 555 products subject to the US tariffs, 85 are goods that Canada does not export to the US, a proportion of nearly one-sixth.
According to the Toronto Star, Jean Simard, president of the Canadian Aluminium Association and a member of Prime Minister Carney’s Canada-US advisory group, confirmed the data on Tuesday (21st). He stated bluntly that this indicates the Trump administration’s new round of trade escalation is “fully in line” with its strategy of further pressuring Canada. Randomly listing items is intended to disrupt cross-border trade.
Jennifer Robson, an associate professor of political administration at Carleton University, found through independent analysis of U.S. trade data that at least 40 products on the list have had no record of being imported into the U.S. from Canada for at least one year in the past two years. These include natural sponges, agar gel, rare iris oil, and whole cowhides, none of which have any Canadian export records to the U.S. by 2025.
Robertson points out that this list is not a strategic weapon aimed at precise strikes against key targets; rather, it resembles a shotgun-like list, quite disorganized. The core intention of the US is not to consider actual trade volume, but to attempt to comprehensively hinder border trade, thereby creating high levels of market uncertainty. The upgrade measures will affect 28 billion yuan. On Monday (August 20), Trump announced a 50% tariff increase on a large number of Canadian goods, directly breaking the tariff-free protection under the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement), and the tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 19.
The US invoked a special provision of the Tariff Act of 1930, claiming it was to counter discriminatory trade policies by Canada against US automobiles and alcohol, and to resolve the long-standing dispute over dairy products. This trade storm is expected to impact approximately $28 billion worth of Canadian goods sold annually to its southern neighbour, representing about 5% of Canada’s total exports to the United States. In addition to forestry and electronics manufacturing, the list deliberately targets specific provinces that previously removed U.S. alcoholic beverages from their shelves, including politically sensitive items such as alcohol and dairy products.
Legal professionals and Labor unions urge adherence to ethical standards. International trade lawyer Lawrence Herman pointed out that the Trump administration’s move is utterly illegitimate. He emphasized that it demonstrates the extremely low credibility of trade agreements signed by the United States, and that the two countries will enter a wavering and unstable relationship in the future.
Lana Payne, national president of Unifor, called on the Canadian government to quickly return to the negotiating table and make every effort to manoeuvre during the 28-day grace period. Payne emphasized that if the U.S. does not withdraw the tariff order next month, Canada must demonstrate a firm stance, uphold its bottom line, and make no further concessions.
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer defended Trump’s tariffs before the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday, insisting the move was in response to a national emergency stemming from a trade deficit of up to $1.2 trillion. However, Democratic Senator Ron Wyden criticized the Trump administration, saying it had lost its way in the tariff war and had formally proposed a bill to limit the president’s tariff powers.
