Ten people died on a high school campus.

Canadian police reported a serious shooting in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, leaving 10 people dead, including the gunman. Tumbler Ridge Police issued a statement saying that at approximately 1:20 p.m. local time, they received a report of a shooting at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School.

Police subsequently found the bodies of six victims on school grounds, and one person died en route to the hospital from their injuries. Additionally, police found two more bodies at a residence believed to be related to the case. Police confirmed the gunman was dead, with his body found on school grounds; the preliminary cause of death is determined to be “self-harm.”

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement on social media on the evening of March 10, expressing his “shock” at the serious shooting incident that occurred that day in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, and pledging full federal government support for the aftermath. Carney stated that he had contacted British Columbia Premier David Ibe and instructed Public Safety Minister Gary Ananda Sangari to coordinate the federal response.

According to reports, the shooting occurred at the only secondary school in Tumbler Ridge, which enrols students in grades 7-12 and has only 175 students enrolled this year. That evening, the local government issued a statement saying that the community “experienced a deeply distressing incident. We stand with all those affected and understand that many residents may be shocked, frightened, and overwhelmed.”

In fact, Canada is not the United States, and school shootings are not common there. Unlike the United States, Canada has strict gun control. Although the provinces have not eliminated the possibility of private gun ownership, they have enacted strict restrictions such as “ammunition can only be stored in designated areas.”

Private individuals carrying firearms into public places, regardless of whether they are concealed or loaded, are subject to strict restrictions. Historically, Canada, like the United States, had relatively lax gun control policies for civilians. However, the 1989 shooting at the University of Montreal in Quebec sparked a debate about gun control. A man shot and killed 14 women at the university’s engineering faculty. This incident prompted the Canadian government to implement a federal gun registration system and enact corresponding gun control legislation.

In 2012, the then Conservative government abolished the system, deeming it a waste of money and ineffective in reducing crime. At the same time, it amended the gun classification law, allowing private individuals to purchase certain types of civilian, non-automatic, fewer long guns, but without relaxing restrictions on ammunition and other aspects. The subsequent Liberal government under Trudeau, which took office, also began gun control efforts.

In 2018, it released legislative proposals seeking stricter gun control, one measure being requiring gun buyers to provide complete personal information, particularly regarding any history of violence. It also pushed for the enactment of related legislation. This included provisions such as expanded background checks, license verification, record keeping, transportation permits, and classification authority, making gun control even more stringent. Because the University of Montreal shooting occurred on campus, Canada has stricter gun control regulations on school grounds than off campus.

Prior to this incident, British Columbia had set a record of zero fatalities and zero shootings in its primary and secondary schools by 2025, making this event a widespread shock to Canadians.

Although details of the case are still under investigation, some local sociologists point out that most of Canada’s few school shootings occur in so-called “desperate towns”—small towns located in remote areas where communities and economies are in severe decline. For example, the 2016 school shooting in La Loche, Saskatchewan, Canada, occurred in a sparsely populated, high-latitude Indigenous town with a population of less than 3,000. Following the incident, a former local councillor stated that job opportunities in the town were scarce, and many people felt hopeless about their lives, despite the government’s efforts to provide support and protections with little success.

Coincidentally, the location of this school shooting is another familiar “desperate town.”

This is a young city that was born in the 1980s due to the needs of coal mining, and at its peak, it had a population of over ten thousand. However, since the closure of many local coal mines and layoffs, emerging industries such as timber processing and dinosaur relic tourism have been insufficient to fill the gap, resulting in a drop in the local population to just over 2,000.

Residents are experiencing a high incidence of mental illness due to stress caused by unemployment. Due to urban decay and severe utility shortages, local media previously reported that there had been no nighttime or weekend emergency services since September of last year. Local government officials also complained that the nearest hospital was more than 100 kilometres away, and that the city had only two ambulances, one of which was not even staffed to the minimum standard.

Data from the British Columbia Emergency Medical Services shows that from September to December 2025, one ambulance was manned 92% of the time on average, while another was manned 83% of the time. Local officials have stated that this means sometimes there are no ambulances available, or no second ambulance, “which would be a problem if something happened.” Unfortunately, their prediction has come true. Canada is sparsely populated; Statistics Canada data shows that most of the country’s population lives within 200 kilometres of the US-Canada border.

In other words, most of Canada’s landmass houses less than one-third of its population. Even in times of economic prosperity, remote communities far from densely populated areas and public attention can easily become “desperate towns.”

Once the economy declines and welfare and public spending are cut, the number of such “desperate towns” will surge, and if this is not taken seriously, public governance risks, such as routine security management, will also increase dramatically. From this perspective, how to deal with similar situations will be a long-term governance challenge that the Canadian government will have to face.